The Spring Buyer’s Guide in the March issue of Runners World Magazine gave a few NB’s some great reviews. Buyer’s guides are great sources of information, and good to check out before you go buy your next pair of performance kicks. Keep in mind they don’t test every shoe out there so you need to make sure you so your research. Here is what they had to say about the NBs.
Review of the New Balance 1011:
“The 1011 is one stable shoe. While RW Shoe Lab tests showed it to be the firmest in this guide, its forefoot is surprisingly flexible. This is due to an updated flex-groove pattern that runs all the way across the width of the shoe. This, along with a new sockliner and an extra layer of foam, gives the 1011 a better fit and feel. The laces now connect to the midsole with four nylon bands (New Balance traditionally only uses two). Recommended for bigger runners with flat arches who need plenty of motion control.”
Review of the New Balance 768:
New Balance has increased this update’s flexibility by removing a layer of rubber from the forefoot flex grooves. A longer midsole post, also new, makes the 768 more stable than the 767. Another welcome addition is the internal liner that backs many of the upper seams with mesh to reduce blisters and hot spots. A less-welcome change is the $5 price increase. Recommended for runners with low arches looking for a durable everyday trainer.
Review of the New Balance 1062:
New Balance overhauled the sole of the 1062 to make it more supportive than its predecessor. The transition bridge is now thicker, and the heel is segmented into three independent pods to better isolate impact forces and promote a smoother transition from heel-strike to toe-off. It’s still the stiffest shoe in this guide. Recommended for bigger runners with normal to high arches who want good cushioning with a bit of added support.
